Magoosh is excited to offer you a free GRE practice test with video answers and explanations. Regardless of whether you choose to study with Greenlight Test Prep, I believe you'll benefit from my many free resources.
GMAT Analytical Writing Assessment (AWA)
Print view. First unread post. Add a Tag. GRE 1 : Q V How to get 6. Guide to Perfect 6. I did put a lot of time in it the first time Being a non-native speaker and having not written a damn essay of any kind in many many years, I was very scared of the AWA. So, I went through every guide that I could find and wrote nearly essays.
Even had a friend grade them for me Pathetic, huh? Anyway, for my second time, I just looked over my templates I created and wrote one of each the day before test just to refresh my memory on faster typing without making too many typos So, here it is Enjoy, and please do not blame me if the 6. General Structure Intro - Restate argument, point out flaws or state intention to discuss them below 1st Para - First, Templates Intro: The argument claims that This statement is a stretch For example, The argument could have been much clearer if it explicitly stated that This is again a very weak and unsupported claim as the argument does not demonstrate any correlation between To illustrate, In fact, it is not at all clear If the argument had provided evidence that Without convincing answers to these questions, one is left with the impression that the claim is more of a wishful thinking rather than substantive evidence.
GMAT Analytical Writing Assessment tips – How to score a perfect 6 on GMAT AWA
Conclusion: In conclusion, the argument is flawed for the above-mentioned reasons and is therefore unconvincing. It could be considerably strengthened if the author clearly mentioned all the relevant facts In this particular case Without this information, the argument remains unsubstantiated and open to debate.
This electronic game rating system is not working because it is self regulated and the fines for violating the rating system are nominal. As a result an independent body should oversee the game industry and companies that knowingly violate the rating system should be prohibited from releasing a game for two years. Point out flaws in the argument's logic and analyze the argument's underlying assumptions.
In addition, evaluate how supporting evidence is used and what evidence might counter the argument's conclusion. You may also discuss what additional evidence could be used to strengthen the argument or what changes would make the argument more logically sound. The argument claims that the electronic games rating system, although similar to the movie rating system, is not working because it is self regulated and violation fines are nominal, Hence, the gaming rating system should be overseen by an independent body. Stated in this way the argument fails to mention several key factors, on the basis of which it could be evaluated.
The conclusion relies on assumptions, for which there is no clear evidence. Therefore, the argument is rather weak, unconvincing, and has several flaws. First, the argument readily assumes that because the electronic game rating system is self regulated, it is not working well. This statement is a stretch and not substantiated in any way. There are numerous examples in other areas of business or commerce, where the entities are self regulated and rather successful.
For instance, FIA, the Formula1 racing organization is self regulated. Yet, the sport is very popular and successful, drawing millions of spectators around the world each year. Tickets are rather expensive, races are shown on pay-per-view, and nearly all drivers are paid very well. Another example is the paralleled movie rating system that the argument mentions. The author fails to clarify whether it is working well, but it is clear that the movie rating system is pretty well received by people, who often base their decisions to go see a movie with kids or not on the movie rating.
It has never been a case when someone would feel cheated by the movie rating and express disappointment afterwards. Since the movie rating system is also self regulated, it follows that this regulatory method is working pretty well and it is not obvious how it can be the reason for the poor electronic game rating system. The argument would have been much clearer if it explicitly gave examples of how the self regulatory system led to bad ratings and customer dissatisfaction.
- othello essays on trust;
- Test's Subscription Expires:.
- Introduction to GRE Analytical Writing?
- Ace the GMAT Analytical Writing Assessment (AWA) Essay.
- About UrbanPro?
- Hi GREPrepClubber!.
Second, the argument claims that any violation fees for bad electronic game ratings are nominal. It thus suggests that this is yet another reason for the rating system not working. This is again a very weak and unsupported claim as the argument does not demonstrate any correlation between the monetary amount of the fines and the quality of the electronic game rating system. In fact, the argument does not even draw a parallel with the mentioned movie rating system and its violation fines. If any such correlation had been shown for the movie rating system, which supposedly works well, then the author would have sounded a bit more convincing.
In addition, if the argument provided evidence that low violation fines lead to electronic game manufacturers to ignore any regulations with respect to the game rating system, the argument could have been strengthened even further. Finally, the argument concludes that an independent body should oversee the game industry and companies that violate the rating system, should be punished. From this statement again, it is not at all clear how an independent regulatory body can do a better job than a self regulated one. Without supporting evidence and examples from other businesses where independent regulatory bodies have done a great job, one is left with the impression that the claim is more of a wishful thinking rather than substantive evidence.
As a result, this conclusion has no legs to stand on. In summary, the argument is flawed and therefore unconvincing.
GMAT Coaching classes in:
It could be considerably strengthened if the author clearly mentioned all the relevant facts. In order to assess the merits of a certain situation, it is essential to have full knowledge of all contributing factors. Re: How to get 6. Last edited by onindkamboj on 26 Sep , , edited 1 time in total. Winner of Tour De France , he was not first person from the United states who won this title , but he won after fighting with life threatening illness. The Medicis, a powerful banking family of Renaissance Italy, supported artists Michelangelo and Raphael.
The second option, the dog, requires daily attention. The dog has been known to damage household property, and it requires walks on a daily basis.
With training, the dog can learn to be relatively self-sufficient. As mentioned earlier, the scenario will always be presented in the same way. The first part will present a choice, the second part the bullet statements will present two considerations that need to be weighed in making that choice, and the third part will provide more information about the two choices at hand. Notice that there is no right or wrong answer here.
- GMAT ANALYTICAL WRITING ASSESSMENT VIDEOS.
- business and administration coursework;
- winston churchill essay on art.
- GMAT Test Resources - GMAT Analytical Writing - Barrons Test Prep.
- Analytical Writing Approach and Scoring.
- Awa essay gmat.
- college anecdotes essay?
In fact, the scenario is presented in such a way as to make it difficult to decide which option is better! They both have their pros and cons.
The following will outline a process for planning and writing your essay. In the test booklet, set up a table that has the two choices along the top and the two considerations along the side. For our example, it might look like this:. Keep in mind, however, that the scenario you will see on your exam will be much less familiar to you. Organizing the information in grid form will make it much easier for you to see the relative strengths and weaknesses of each choice. At this point, you want to make a decision.
Analytical Writing Assessment – GMATing
Is it more important for John that the pet be maintenance-free or that it be a loyal companion? Even so, you need to decide which you will make more important. If John has a true companion and friend, the daily maintenance will become a labor of love instead of a hassle. Your decision in step 2 should lead you to a clear choice.
Summarize the decision to be made. Acknowledge the complexity of the decision. State your opinion. State why the primary consideration the one you chose to be the primary consideration is more important and how your choice satisfies this consideration. State why the other choice cat falls short in this regard. State how your choice still does an okay job with the secondary consideration.
Spelling errors, misprints, grammatical errors, etc. You will receive a grade from 1 to 6 on each and these will be sent with your GMAT scores. The essay topics are available for you to review beforehand. Press enter to begin your search.
Related the gmat analytical writing assessment part 2 the issue essay
Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved